Four years years ago AT&T, a company that, for years, cheapened out on upgrading its broadband lines to fiber, effectively stopped selling DSL. While that’s understandable given the limitations of the dated copper-based tech, the problem is that thanks to concentrated telecom monopolization, many of these customers were left without any replacement options due to a lack of competition.

  • @SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    In our area we have Spectrum (formerly Time Warner), Breezeline (formerly Atlantic Broadband), and AT&T.

    Breezeline came into this area by buying a regional ISP called WOW (Wide Open West). The first thing they did was cancel all existing plans and double the prices. I had 200 Mbps at $30/mo., which immediately went to $70/mo with no speed increase. Then they began sabotaging upgrading the infrastructure, and suddenly I was without Internet. It would take a tech a month to get out and “check my equipment”, along with a $50 service fee.

    So I dropped them.

    Spectrum offered 300 Mbps at $70/mo.

    AT&T offered UVerse and claimed to have fiber in our area. But not for apartments ofc. The only other option from AT&T was 50 Mbps at $60/mo. “But that’s the actual speed, other ISPs don’t actually deliver 300 Mbps, it’s really more like 40.” An actual quote from the AT&T sales rep.

    So I still have spectrum, and it works well enough. ~270 down and 10 up, at now $80/mo.

    Never work with a company that has the back of the Death Star as their logo

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)
    link
    511 days ago

    My choices are them or comcrap. Probably switching to the later because ATT is never going to upgrade my lines to fiber, despite living in a major metropolitan area. It really is infuriating.