Reposted from lemmy.world c/politics since it violated it’s rule #1 about links.

Now that the fascists have taken over, what books, academic studies, and pieces of knowledge should take priority in personal/private archival? I’m thinking about what happened in Nazi Germany, especially with the burning of the Institute for Sexual Science(Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) and what was lost completely in the burnings.

Some of us should consider saving stuff digitally or physically.

  • exu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 months ago

    Considering the precedents in the US, any books about gender, sex and history.

      • onoira [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        seconding a focus on sexology; we don’t need another Institut für Sexualwissenschaft incident.

        off the top of my head:

        • The History of Sexuality (Michel Foucault 1976 – 84 + 2018)
        • Transgender Warriors (Leslie Feinberg 1998)
        • Gender Trouble (Judith Butler 1990)
        • Undoing Gender (Judith Butler 2004)
        • Caliban and the Witch (Silvia Federici 2004)
        • Black on Both Sides (C. Riley Snorton 2017)
        • The Stonewall Riots (Marc Stein 2019)

        including all the works of Judith Butler and Silvia Federici.

        more academically:

        • Kinsey Reports; The Kinsey Institute: The First Seventy Years; and any other expansions on the work of the Kinsey Institute
        • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Healthcare: A Clinical Guide to Preventive, Primary, and Specialist Care (Kristen Eckstrand, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld 2016)

        you can probably farm the bibilographies on these.

    • @drake
      link
      11 month ago

      I remember reading somewhere that there are copies of bits of archive.org distributed across the globe, but the majority of it is in US data centres. It’s incredibly big, though, so it’s hard to just take a copy of it and move it somewhere else.

  • @cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    I get the sentiment, but in this time and age and with the internet, I think the information most likely to be at risk of being destroyed or censored is the one that is not commonly available, or in the hands of law enforcement.

    A fascist government will more likely effectively prevent creation of new dissenting works, than suppressing existing ones.

  • This is ludicrously alarmist. I mean, archive whatever you want (it’s good practice to back up things you think are important), but the United States is hardly a fascist dictatorship anymore than it was in 2017 (or 2021 or 2013…). The opposing party wins sometimes, and it hasn’t ended the republic yet. Federal funding might be cut to new gender research, but nobody’s going to go around to universities, confiscating copies of existing studies to be burned.

  • @Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    22 months ago

    All the instances where the Dems were doing the exact same shit so they can’t pretend they are the solution

  • @TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “The fascists have taken over” yet were the non-fascists that decided to cut episodes and scenes from old tv shows and movies because they were offensive thus destroying culture in the process. Interesting.

    • @d_ohlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -92 months ago

      Gonna get downvoted for this probably but I honestly don’t care. I’m so sick and tired of hearing all the negativity and attacks and unrealistic over-the-top doomsday scenarios, from both sides. Regardless of who won, life is going to continue on just fine. The full on meltdowns are getting so damn old and it’s just tiring.

      • @fenndev@leminal.space
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 months ago

        “Life is going to continue on just fine” - unless you’re a woman (bans on contraceptives, loss of bodily autonomy), queer (rolling back protections for LGBTQ+ people, penalizing even talking about them), non-Christian, a minority…

        • @418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          This. Women are already literally dying. The first woman (that we know of) to die from the abortion ban happened within just 20 days – before SCOTUS even heard the case that overturned Roe. And her story is a painful, heartbreaking read.

          Plus, does nobody remember immigrant families being ripped apart? Kids put in cages? Their “family ID” being – whoops – deleted from the database so they couldn’t be reunited with their parents?

          But sure. Life will go on like normal.

        • @andioop@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Queer nonwhite woman, I really really hope I am just overreacting. Nothing bad happened to me personally at all during the first Trump presidency, and I hope that privilege and/or good luck holds out.

          And even still, that is just my selfish emotional reaction which is entirely controlled by what happens to me? and not at all by the fate of more at-risk people. Even if I make out well, that does not mean other people will continue to have their rights respected. I really hope that we’re all overreacting, because being wrong and annoying online is so much better than being right and having things go very poorly for us in reality.

          Although I understand how negativity and doom and gloom online, even justified doom and gloom, can get to you. I, as a member of several demographics likely to be affected, would also like to stop hearing about this all the time. It is certainly not helping me cope or do anything productive about the situation. Especially when it invades spaces that were very topic-focused and that you did not expect to be dooming and glooming about world events. I’ve had that happen to me and it was very very frustrating. In an ideal world I’d care and be mad and fight against whatever injustice is happening, but in reality I often have no more capacity to care because there are so many issues to be outraged about and to care about and causes to fight for that you get burnt out, spread too thin, too much negativity. I pick and choose my battles and close my ears to other ones, and I’ve decided that is ultimately okay because I need to do this so I have enough capacity to fight any battles at all.

          I do take the strategy of trying to keep to topic-focused places. I never explore All and on most instances I’ll also avoid Local, because even without politics there is probably some depressing meme about how the world sucks that’s on Hot. Instead I keep to my topic-focused communities. I curate my online experience so I can avoid that kind of thing. (And if these kinds of memes make you laugh or otherwise feel better, then more power to you! This is aimed at people who it makes feel worse, like myself.) And if depressing world news starts to invade places not designated for world news (even if only in comment sections and not the general posts)… at this point, I’d just say screw it and go to places way more likely to be free of this. Hello new recipe, hello webpage for learning a new programming language; goodbye social media in general. (Yes, I recognize that replying on Lemmy is not exactly avoiding social media. I took a calculated risk by going on programming.dev, a topic-focused instance I deemed less likely than other social media to have this. You see how it turned out, especially given I chose to click on this post at all, let alone read the comments and reply. But even still I would bet programming.dev has less doom and gloom about world news than more general purpose instances of comparable size.)

          I get people need spaces to feel their feelings about world events, to talk them out, to bring them up when relevant. People also need spaces free of this kind of talk and those are increasingly getting harder to find as more people feel hopeless and need to express it somewhere and oh look, this community does not have rules against it… I empathize a lot with the person you replied to, as someone who is also trying to avoid that kind of doom and gloom content. I know perfectly well that both people like and unlike me are having an awful time and often in ways that I cannot do anything to stop (in the sense that, say, donating to a domestic abuse charity and volunteering helps victims but it also does not stop that specific victim in that specific place from suffering RIGHT NOW—you can often do something to help in some small way, but your individual power is indeed limited), I do not need constant reminders to ruin my day, thank you very much.

          I usually try to feel my feelings and then look for what I can do about a situation, but this one had me too overwhelmed with the feelings to remember my second step of doing something about it, so I thought I might mention at least one thing people can do about it that I found (I guess this paragraph is less specifically directed at anyone in the above chain and more at others reading the thread). Volunteering with charities or organizations meant to help certain affected demographics such as people of color, women, and queer people, is a nice way to gain back some sense of control, and is supposed to make you feel good, but I understand not everyone has the time or capacity to do that. Donating to causes can also help if you have the money but not the time. A quick online search for what you can do given x situation might be helpful.

      • JaggedRobotPubes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Well you only need to worry about it from one side, so that’s half your worries gone right there.