• 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 年前

    Yes, simple. Easy to explain to the average person, easy to implement. Now, as for our overlords with all the money allowing it? Complicated.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        It’s the kind of change you don’t ask for permission to change. I don’t think the system is capable of reforming itself.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      RCV is completed enough that it’s causing disenfranchisement problems with poor and low education voters. Better to go with approval voting, which gets the same results while making invalid ballots impossible.

      The way we make that happen is by starting with local referendums and working our way up. It’s a lot of work, but it’s the main way good stuff happens in our democracy.

      • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        That abstract describes disenfranchisement due to overvote, which is choosing more candidates than allowed. If these fucking morons cannot follow directions, they likely are too stupid to be trusted to vote. I’d rather that type of self culling than the current methods.

        • Schadrach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          Now, try saying that about Florida in 2000. You know, “butterfly ballots” and all.