Foldable smartphones have reached their fifth major generation, as heralded by Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Fold 5…

For me it’s definitely the durability concerns. I’ve valued my phone’s water and dust resistance since getting an ip67 phone years and years ago. My brother had a flip and a grain of sand in his pocket got under the display; when he closed the phone the display died. And they expect me to pay more for the privilege.

    • Glarrf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I respect your opinion, but for me is it hardly a gimmick. I don’t need a tablet in my bag to view websites that aren’t compatible with mobile layouts, I have a tablet in my pocket whenever I want. Sure it’s not for everyone, just like iPhones vs Android, but the form factor of foldables absolutely solves the needs of some customers and I’m grateful there’s a line of products out there that fits my needs.

      It took me a week or so to get used to the form factor but since then I can’t imagine going back to a slab. Different strokes for different folks.

        • Glarrf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I work with a lot of crappy websites and embedded systems. I can’t always carry a laptop, so a mobile device fits my use case very well. I also use my large screen to do split screen with two apps open at once, it makes taking notes and observations from videos and documentation a breeze.

  • harmonea
    link
    fedilink
    7711 months ago

    The phrase “what’s stopping you” implies we’re all interested, but hesitant.

    This is a really, really bad assumption.

    • Lev_Astov
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      It also assumes there’s anything stopping us. I’m annoyed they didn’t have a “nothing” option on the poll. I’ve been loving my Flip 4 and hope they keep making options like it when I eventually wear it down.

    • @electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Why are you not interested? I personally like the idea of either having a normal size phone that gets larger or a normal size phone that gets smaller. Are you saying you sre not interested in foldable phones at all?

      • harmonea
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        Disinterest is the default position until something sparks interest. Asking why I’m not interested is, with respect, a nonsense question that can only have one answer: because I haven’t seen anything about it that sparks my interest. “It folds” is not enough to make me feel any desire to own one; I don’t care that it folds. I don’t need it to fold. To me, this is like installing a microwave in my vacuum cleaner. Like, sure, now my vacuum cleaner objectively does more stuff and “is better,” but that’s not exactly a feature I’m looking for in a vacuum cleaner, and size-changing is not a feature I’m looking for in a phone.

        If you want one, you should get one. I’m glad the option exists so that people for whom “it folds” is enough to spark interest can be happy and have neat toys.

          • jsnfwlr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Foldables have the potential to make phones better for some people. But better is always subjective. And in my opinion the current faults with foldables means they aren’t ready for me to use yet.

            • @electrogamerman@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -311 months ago

              So the response to “what’s stopping you from getting a foldable” is: the currents faults in foldable. See? Its not too hard.

          • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            The trade off of a phone being half as tall is it’s twice as thick.

            I’m a man and pockets for men usually aren’t super short so the phone being tall isn’t an issue. And I definitely don’t want the phone to be twice as thick. Women’s clothes with their awfully small pockets I could understand. But I’m a big MFer so pocket size isn’t a problem.

  • Nerd02
    link
    fedilink
    5011 months ago

    Uhh the price tag? I just bought a new phone after 6 years of honoured service from my old one, payed the new one a whopping 300€ and it already felt like a rip off. Ain’t no way I’m paying four digits for a phone.

  • @RisingGrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4411 months ago

    Price. It’s just too high to consider for me right now when I can get phones with the same computing power for half the cost

  • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2311 months ago

    Price, durability, use case…

    There’s nothing about them that makes them worth sacrificing the first two above.

  • Big P
    link
    fedilink
    2211 months ago

    The price, the line down the middle, the hinge. Generally just not requiring any more screen space

  • @reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t see the point of it. It might be smaller in height when folded, but it’s twice as thick. That doesn’t make it any easier to pocket.

    It also seems unnecessarily over complicated. The folding screen technology also doesn’t seem mature (high crease failure). I would think at least one or two phone companies would design them so they just met at a bezel-less seam rather than trying to actually fold an oled/lcd screen.

  • @The_Fundertaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2011 months ago

    They’re prohibitively expensive, the aspect ratio is dumb, and the fold/crease is distracting as hell.

    It reminds me of back in the '00s when people were getting the sidekick or whatever that “T” shaped phone was that Tony Stark had in Ironman.

    • @UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      For real, it’s that easy for foldables. Sub-$500 foldables with really durable screens seems another decade or so away however.

  • @meta_synth@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1711 months ago

    -Not durable (If you can damage the screen with your fingernail it’s not durable enough. Period.) -No headphone jack

    • No expandable storage
    • No removae battery
    • Lack of support for folding screens in apps
    • Extremely high prices
  • @prey169@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1611 months ago

    They don’t have the actual answer in their poll for me which is, you pay 1800 for the z fold but get the camera of the s23 basic model. Which is wild.

    Give me the ultra cameras and I’ll buy it

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      Yeah, the price is definitely the big issue with those for me. I love the form factor (especially the ones that look like the flip phones of old), but I’m not paying triple what a regular phone with similar specs would be just for that.

    • @Kingofthezyx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Exactly this. I actually loved using the ZFold 4 when I tried it out, but losing the quality of the main cam and 10x zoom was a huge bummer for the price I was paying.

      The Galaxy Note series used to have the absolute best cameras that would eventually come to the S line. If you’re going to charge a premium for a phone it needs to be the best.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 months ago

      Why? Are you in professional photography? All cameras after like 2020 are so good it hardly matters.

      Source:I have a fold4