• ddh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wholeheartedly? The problem for people is the income, not the work.

      • ddh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Like, you’re against people buying robot vacuums?

        • Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Do you have problems following the topic of discussion? Because no one said anything about vacuums. For one, vacuums aren’t based on AI. Secondly, the topic is about AI taking jobs from people.

          Try and keep up.

          • ddh
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Modern robot vacuums do use AI. Try and keep up indeed.

            The point of the vacuum example is to understand which parts of a ‘job’ you have a problem with AI replacing, using a housework example which requires labor but provides no income. I take it from your non-answer that you have no problem with AI replacing labor, just not income. Is that correct?

            • Pratai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              ROFL. A roomba is not AI. It’s just programmed to not bump into walls. Roomba’s don’t learn, nor are they taking anyone’s job

              Go back and read the meme. And this time- attempt to understand it. It’s about JOBS. not labor.