• @NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Should either be illegal or taxed so heavily that any such action would result in a massive loss on each property owned by these ghouls.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    And here I am like a sucker, moving in with my parents, so I can actually save some money and maybe, maybe buy one house of my own some day.

    • circuitfarmer
      link
      11 year ago

      Ah, but some day wall street will just own all the houses. It’s a race!

  • @Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    We need to establish an owner-occupancy exemption to property taxes. Owner-occupants of 1-4 unit structures owe 50% of assessed property taxes, and are credited for the other 50%. Non-occupant owners pay the full tax rate.

    Non-occupant landlords can avoid the taxes by issuing a land contract or private mortgage instead of a rental agreement. The “tenant” becomes the deed holder, and gains equity in the property.

    • Cyclohexane
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Is that enough incentive for the landlord to do this? I think they would still rather rent it out and raise rent prices to account for the difference.

      • @Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Some certainly will raise rents, but at the margins, it will certainly have effects. It will definitely influence investor ROIs in the right directions: harming institutional investors, while benefitting local landowners and tenants.

        The numbers I gave might not be the right ones. They might be far too much, or far too little to achieve the degree of market influence we need.