My recent musings on Gopher-commerce. Humbly submitted to the community for discussion…

  • @dbucklin
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    I bought an 1802 kit from TMSI and it could have been done over Gopher. Out-of-band payment and I had to fill out and send an order form. It went really well and I’d definitely do it again. An experiment in this space could be low-stakes; stickers or something. If Gopher is best thought of as an improvement on FTP, Gopher commerce is an improvement on sending an SASE with a dollar bill. I’d try it.

    • @visiblink
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @dbucklin
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Yes, 100%.

        One of the challenges will be getting order information from the buyer to the seller in a way that is consistent and error-free. Item numbers, unit prices, shipping, tax, total due. Without a shopping cart application, sellers might be best served by bundling shipping and tax into the item price. Alternatively, gopher commerce could make use of a purchase order/invoice pattern. That’s a bit more work for everyone, but should reduce miscommunication.

    • jrsharpOP
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      This is really encouraging, thanks! Yeah, this is really what I’ve been thinking, too. Was thinking about stickers and even T-shirts… Wanted to get them printed at a local shop, too – seemed especially appropriate.

      • jrsharpOP
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also thinking about this for slightly larger-ticket items… not unlike that sweet 1802 kit of yours, actually. :)

        • @dbucklin
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          It might be worth thinking about some kind of rating system or method for confirming purchases a la Reddit marketplaces. Maybe buyers can create a gopher-accessible file with purchase details and sellers can link to that as a way of building a reputation.

          • @screwtapeM
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            You’ve actually convinced me that this was at least a reasonable idea but I don’t think a gopherhole shop rating system would be in theme with the closely knit community dynamic we have.

            The protocol was going to have a feature-rich, shopping-friendly set of extensions, but when this was proposed in 1993, there was a community backlash against commercialising the gopher; read Albert Rosetti’s booklet about what happened. This is roughly how the gopher protocol became both liberated and hyperstable in the early 90s.

            Imagine if a gopher wanted to sell or otherwise pass on some old computer hardware. It makes sense to share that on their gopherhole: And since payment handling is ~ always legally middle-manned by a payment handler who will handle the payment anyway, the protocol wouldn’t need to be extended to be a payment processer.

            On the other hand, I would be against paving paradise to put up a parking lot.