@ylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoIn Cringe Video, OpenAI CTO Says She Doesn’t Know Where Sora’s Training Data Came Fromfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square185fedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down125cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1491arrow-down1external-linkIn Cringe Video, OpenAI CTO Says She Doesn’t Know Where Sora’s Training Data Came Fromfuturism.com@ylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square185fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
minus-square@exanime@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoBut they ARE selling it … Every answer Chat GPT makes came from possibly stolen material
minus-squareBoscoBearlinkEnglish2•4 months agoIsn’t that true of every opinion you have. All the knowledge you have is based on works of others that came before you.
minus-square@exanime@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoNot untill I bill you for it Also, no there is such a thing as an original thought or opinion… Even if it’s informed on other knowledge There is a difference between reinterpreting other knowledge and just Frankensteining multiple work together
minus-squareBoscoBearlinkEnglish1•4 months agoI don’t know enough about LLMs but Neural networks are capable of original thought. I suspect LLMs are too because of their relationship to Neural Networks.
minus-square@confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoYou’re using the word ‘stolen’ which doesn’t fit. It would be accurate to say 'every answer comes from possibly unlicensed material '.
minus-square@Guntrigger@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoAllegedly possibly maybe accidentally whoopsie not quite licensed fully material.
minus-square@exanime@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoYeap, the real term (I think) would be copyright infringement
But they ARE selling it … Every answer Chat GPT makes came from possibly stolen material
Isn’t that true of every opinion you have. All the knowledge you have is based on works of others that came before you.
Not untill I bill you for it
Also, no there is such a thing as an original thought or opinion… Even if it’s informed on other knowledge
There is a difference between reinterpreting other knowledge and just Frankensteining multiple work together
I don’t know enough about LLMs but Neural networks are capable of original thought. I suspect LLMs are too because of their relationship to Neural Networks.
You’re using the word ‘stolen’ which doesn’t fit. It would be accurate to say 'every answer comes from possibly unlicensed material '.
Allegedly possibly maybe accidentally whoopsie not quite licensed fully material.
Yeap, the real term (I think) would be copyright infringement