• Bronco1676@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      At least it is royality free compared to HDMI which has a large annual fee + per unit fee for manufacturers

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        Oh. It’s absolutely superior on the royalties side. Just incredibly frustrating that what should be an open standard that anyone can tinker with is not.

        • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 年前

          It’s at least partially because the specification was designed to detect and thwart attempts to tee the video and audio data in order to bypass copy protection on DVDs and Blu-Rays, iirc.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 年前

            It is indeed and the fact that I don’t care about any of that makes it that much more frustrating. I got bored with piracy nearly two decades ago and just want to implement my own open-source virtual display systems in hardware and gateway I shouldn’t need to either cough up thousands of dollars a year or find a copy of a PDF that someone “accidentally” left at a public location in order to do so with an established protocol standard.