Measures moving through Congress to encourage new reactors are receiving broad bipartisan support, as lawmakers embrace a once-contentious technology.

The House this week overwhelmingly passed legislation meant to speed up the development of a new generation of nuclear power plants, the latest sign that a once-contentious source of energy is now attracting broad political support in Washington.

The 365-to-36 vote on Wednesday reflected the bipartisan nature of the bill, known as the Atomic Energy Advancement Act. It received backing from Democrats who support nuclear power because it does not emit greenhouse gases and can generate electricity 24 hours a day to supplement solar and wind power. It also received support from Republicans who have downplayed the risks of climate change but who say that nuclear power could bolster the nation’s economy and energy security.

“It’s been fascinating to see how bipartisan advanced nuclear power has become,” said Joshua Freed, who leads the climate and energy program at Third Way, a center-left think tank. “This is not an issue where there’s some big partisan or ideological divide.”

Non-paywall link

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    All I can think about with that title is that’s not what inertia means…

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        No credit for partial answers. The second half of that law is - objects in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force.

        Inertia exists in both motion and stillness. It is a state of matter that doesn’t change. It just is. Saying “decades of inertia” means nothing.