• @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      I’ve used it in multiple places that I don’t like the questions. Hospitals when the tv remote has been “misplaced” (aka staff doesn’t give a fuck and someone stole it,) bars (with permission,) entry into hotel rooms, at my work because I forgot my badge.

      And as mentioned, pen testing. Though not professionally and just at the office (with permission) to see how far it could get (surprisingly far actually, with the right badge.)

      The thing about it is though, it stands out to an extreme. Even if I have it out on a table while sitting down (it’s rather bulky for a pocket) people take notice and ask what it is. “It’s like a universal remote” just raises more questions.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      Besides the obvious nefarious purposes, a pen test is something legit I can think of that would be useful for.

        • capital
          link
          fedilink
          English
          155 months ago

          You can’t see how being less detectable might be in your favor for a pen test?

            • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Part of modern pen testing absolutely involves a bit of social engineering to test policy enforcement

            • capital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              There can be a physical component to it though I’m not too sure about how prevalent it is. Which would be aided by blending in.

          • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -25 months ago

            Is pen testing a visual test now?

            How does the physical appearance of the device affect its electronic penetration?

            • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              75 months ago

              Yes? Pen testing is often “I am hiring you to see how far you can get into the company infrastructure under these constraints.” This includes human interaction, and humans can be a barrier to a pen test.

              Part of that is going to be looking as innocuous as possible. Though admittedly that isn’t always the case. This kinda gets blown away when someone goes “oh look, that’s a flipper zero, aren’t those used for hacking?”

              • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Interesting. It sounded kind of ridiculous to me, I guess I didn’t consider gaining access to a building or something.

                • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  Ah okay, I see the confusion. A lot of people think pen testing is just “try to break into our app” or “try to get into our network” but those are usually narrow scope pen testing.

                  If you truly want to test your security, you can never rule out physical access. You could have the most secure network in the world and it would mean nothing if you kept it in an unlocked room in a publicly accessible area.

                  And you’d be surprised by the number of times pen testers gain access to those rooms because of human mistakes.

    • @privatizetwiddle
      link
      English
      45 months ago

      Some people just prefer to care for their little digital dolphin in peace.