@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square359fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down130cross-posted to: environment@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1989arrow-down1external-linkJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.com@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square359fedilinkcross-posted to: environment@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square@bhmnscmm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoI stand corrected. There is literally no functional difference between “currency” and (at least some) crypto.
minus-square@agent_flounder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoHow much energy is required for use of each?
minus-squarekirklennonlinkfedilink3•1 year ago CBDC is blockchain based, i.e cryptocurrency. A CBDC can be blockchain based, but almost none actually will be. China’s isn’t. Japan’s CBDC is not. In the US, the Federal Reserve is still in early stages but I’m confident it won’t use blockchain either.
deleted by creator
There is no reason for CBDC to use blockchain.
I stand corrected. There is literally no functional difference between “currency” and (at least some) crypto.
How much energy is required for use of each?
A CBDC can be blockchain based, but almost none actually will be. China’s isn’t. Japan’s CBDC is not. In the US, the Federal Reserve is still in early stages but I’m confident it won’t use blockchain either.