@ratman150@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.ml • 5 months agoHow about no?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down119file-text
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageHow about no?sh.itjust.works@ratman150@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.ml • 5 months agomessage-square142fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekratoz29linkfedilinkEnglish90•edit-25 months agoThat disclaimer announcement just screams lazy IT, or general management by your side.
minus-square@AeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish32•5 months agoMy bet is that FF has some privacy and/or adblocking features that this company doesn’t like.
minus-square@Bransons404@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink15•edit-25 months agoThere are a few features that FF doesn’t have that chrome does, but it mostly involves video streaming. Adblocking is likely the reason though. Source: am front end dev
That disclaimer announcement just screams lazy IT, or general management by your side.
My bet is that FF has some privacy and/or adblocking features that this company doesn’t like.
There are a few features that FF doesn’t have that chrome does, but it mostly involves video streaming. Adblocking is likely the reason though.
Source: am front end dev