mistrgamin to pissposting@lemmy.world • 11 months agoframe postinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down110
arrow-up1507arrow-down1imageframe postinglemmy.worldmistrgamin to pissposting@lemmy.world • 11 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@abbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink13•11 months agoStrong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
minus-square@moshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-8•11 months agoSo I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
minus-square@abbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink13•11 months agoAnyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
minus-square@moshtradamus666@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-3•11 months agoDid you have a 300hz monitor back then?
minus-square@abbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink10•11 months agoI did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate. Video with some more information and a useful graphic
Strong disagree, the smoothness afforded by high frame rates will make any game where you directly control the camera feel much better to play.
So I guess you would miss because you had it. Basically what I said.
Anyone playing an older game can have it. I used to think Half Life 2 was special because it just felt better to play, more responsive and fluid, but it turns out it’s just a well optimized game with a framerate cap of 300.
Did you have a 300hz monitor back then?
I did not, but decreased frame time is still noticeable on refresh rates lower than frame rate.
Video with some more information and a useful graphic
Good video