@willya@lemmyf.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agoLeave it alonelemmyf.ukimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1825arrow-down131
arrow-up1794arrow-down1imageLeave it alonelemmyf.uk@willya@lemmyf.uk to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-square@Moops@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish20•edit-29 months agoI mean, runtimes can be a legit reason to say something’s not working.
minus-square@pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink14•9 months agoBut it does work. Eventually. Really, I fixed it because we’re doing an OS upgrade and I didn’t want to wait 2h every time I spun up a new instance to test a change.
minus-square@FiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilink1•9 months agothat’s the problem with the ‘its working’ argument. if you hadn’t touched the working code you might have missed the performance issue to begin with.
I mean, runtimes can be a legit reason to say something’s not working.
But it does work. Eventually.
Really, I fixed it because we’re doing an OS upgrade and I didn’t want to wait 2h every time I spun up a new instance to test a change.
that’s the problem with the ‘its working’ argument.
if you hadn’t touched the working code you might have missed the performance issue to begin with.