• @Pips
    link
    English
    176 months ago

    What do you mean “isn’t that much greater”? The Haaretz study shows a civilian death rate of around 61%, whereas prior conflicts in Gaza had a civilian death rate of 33% to 40%, and the article says the 61% level is unprecedented. A 20%-30% increase is an insane number of additional dead.

    • @blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -66 months ago

      Yes. Those are also facts. They do not change the one you left out. The average is 50%. There has obviously been escalation above the average from being below it. That was not my comment. 60 from 50 isn’t as much of a difference than I’d expected. This all looks so terrible. But apparently that’s the norm

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        50% to 60% is an increase of 20% which is pretty large.

      • @Pips
        link
        English
        96 months ago

        It’s a 20% increase and 10% of the total, which is massive.

        • @blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -106 months ago

          Dude… you would think based on the news it was 99% total, or 500x the norm. I haven’t even heard of a militant killed in months. So maybe 1.2x sounds right to you. Based on the media I consume, I expected literally 3 to 5x if not exponentially more.

          • @Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -16 months ago

            I’d love to be so cynical as you, to see a 20% increase in civillian casualties in a region famous for collateral damage, and go “huh that’s not so much, nothing is happening”. Some people need to learn empathy.