• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    2211 months ago

    Once the wretch is powerless and begging you for their survival, would you really just end them?

    Yes, if the “wretch” is responsible for a huge amount of murder. And, as Stamets says, also if the hero has killed a bunch of people to get there anyway.

    If the hero lets the guy who is going to destroy the world with his special neutronium bomb live because it will change him for the worse if he kills him, I think that’s a ridiculous resolution for a movie.

    • enkers
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Usually the situation isn’t so black and white. It’s not Jack Bauer killing a terrorist that will otherwise go on to blow up a maternity ward. The villain is defeated and they probably already have to deal with the normal societal punishment for what they did wrong, or otherwise live in some equivalent purgatory.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        Come on. We’re talking about a movie, not reality. Kill the bad guy. I mean I like Batman, but the Joker escapes from Arkham every single time he gets put in there. Just kill the guy already.

        • enkers
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Maybe the movie was trying to tell you something…

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            1111 months ago

            That if the hero doesn’t kill a psychopathic criminal, he keeps coming back to kill more people?

            • enkers
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              Maybe it’s trying to say something about preponderance, killing for just belief, and human fallibility.