@minimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square339fedilinkarrow-up12.37Karrow-down1127
arrow-up12.24Karrow-down1imageBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.world@minimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square339fedilink
minus-square@damnYouSun@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoThis is a problem with the US legal system. Every decision is a precedent, no matter how specific it is.
minus-squareZyansheeplinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoWell, Roe v Wade set a precedent, which was then reverted ~50 years later, so I’m not sure how much precedents apply to the supreme court (it definitely applies to lower courts tho)
minus-square@Belgdore@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThis is how common law everywhere that England colonized works. It’s not endemic to the US.
This is a problem with the US legal system. Every decision is a precedent, no matter how specific it is.
Well, Roe v Wade set a precedent, which was then reverted ~50 years later, so I’m not sure how much precedents apply to the supreme court (it definitely applies to lower courts tho)
This is how common law everywhere that England colonized works. It’s not endemic to the US.