One of the best things about reddit was looking for answers or other users with the same problem as you, and since Google didn’t really help with that anymore and instead insisted on giving you business results, the best practice was to put your search terms in followed by ‘reddit’ and you’d find your answer.

  • @chaorace
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Is there any reason the site: syntax can’t be used? For example: Musk site:feddit.de

      • @chaorace
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I don’t understand. I looked at your screenshot again and the search field seems to show feddit.de: Musk. This is not the site: syntax. What I suggested was Musk site:feddit.de. Am I missing something?

        • @albert180@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The site: is feddit.de: and after that follows the search query. It works that way too, and it’s less work to type. Try it out by yourself

          • @chaorace
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            I tried it myself and they’re not similar at all. site: is handled specially through Google’s advanced search syntax while the other approach is no different from a normal keyword. Please refer to the below images with attention to the result counts:

            It’s fine if you don’t want to use the syntax, but using it would solve your problem with keyword autocorrect and properly filter your results to only the website you’ve asked for.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think OP is asking about a broader, Fediverse-scaled search. So using the site: search tag will only search a single Lemmy instance. I don’t think Google will index cross-instance content in those searches, otherwise it’ll end up with a ton of duplicate results. So if what you’re looking for was actually posted to a different instance, it may not be found with that search.

      I’m just theorizing, though, since this is all still really new and untested.