@floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months ago‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down140cross-posted to: science@mander.xyzacademia@mander.xyz
arrow-up1146arrow-down1external-link‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracywww.nature.com@floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: science@mander.xyzacademia@mander.xyz
minus-squareOKRainbowKidlinkEnglish4•6 months agoIf you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
minus-square@rikonium@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoAhh, so the true rate would actually be 50% if it was no better than random chance?
If you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
Ahh, so the true rate would actually be 50% if it was no better than random chance?
Exactly, 50% is a lower bound in that case.