floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down140cross-posted to: science@mander.xyzacademia@mander.xyz
arrow-up1146arrow-down1external-link‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracywww.nature.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square66fedilinkcross-posted to: science@mander.xyzacademia@mander.xyz
minus-squareOKRainbowKidlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIf you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
minus-squarerikonium@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoAhh, so the true rate would actually be 50% if it was no better than random chance?
minus-squareOKRainbowKidlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoExactly, 50% is a lower bound in that case.
If you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
Ahh, so the true rate would actually be 50% if it was no better than random chance?
Exactly, 50% is a lower bound in that case.