nave@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoI wishi.imgur.comimagemessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up1928arrow-down117
arrow-up1911arrow-down1imageI wishi.imgur.comnave@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square187fedilink
minus-squaremryessirlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoPlease elaborate. When and why would his suggestion be worse?
minus-squaremellejwz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoIt will check all of the if statements instead of stopping at the first match.
minus-squaremellejwz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoMy bad, I looked over the returns. If you return something there wouldn’t be much difference between both.
minus-squareCosmicomical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOk just to clarify this was a joke. It was just a pedantic improvement on a deranged solution. The only sensible way to do this is with % 2 or with bitwise operations imo.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.mindoki.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah gotta store the return value in a variable!
Please elaborate. When and why would his suggestion be worse?
It will check all of the if statements instead of stopping at the first match.
Each clause already returns
My bad, I looked over the returns. If you return something there wouldn’t be much difference between both.
Ok just to clarify this was a joke. It was just a pedantic improvement on a deranged solution. The only sensible way to do this is with % 2 or with bitwise operations imo.
Yeah gotta store the return value in a variable!