• circuitfarmer
    link
    English
    681 year ago

    Not enough people running nvidia realize just how much nvidia does to make sure you stick to their proprietary software. That you can close most of the performance gap with FOSS on AMD is an amazing finding.

    Unfortunately it won’t convince many who haven’t already seen the benefits of a more open system.

    • @nogrub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      yeah i have a work college that i got to use vim keybinds in most software but when i tell him that he could control his whole system like that if he switched to linux he dosen’t like the idea because he isn’t used to using linux

    • Turun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Not enough people realize how much AMD does to make sure people stick to their proprietary software. Nvidia software that is.

      A lack of ROCm support on consumer hardware is simply inexcusable. Nvidia makes a shit ton of money with the AI boom, because people like to work with stuff they already know. And it’s infuriating, because Nvidia cards have way less VRAM.

    • @havokdj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -411 year ago

      how much nvidia does to make sure you stick to their proprietary software

      Holy fucking shit you are extremely misguided. Are you not aware that the Linux nvidia drivers are proprietary? The only reason that the mesa drivers are awful is because they barely support the 10 series and they don’t support the new instruction set of the 20’s and above.

      If you are running Nvidia on your system and it is above a 10 series, you are running proprietary software. Big whoop, steam is proprietary too, so are the vast majority of the games you play on steam.

      Hell, nvidia used to be the ones supplying an open source driver on Linux like 14-15 years ago, AMD didn’t have that, only the proprietary driver. DO NOT OWE ALLEGIENCE TO ANY PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY, that’s exactly why we don’t have good FOSS drivers for nvidia now.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        English
        37
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you not aware that the Linux nvidia drivers are proprietary?

        Literally the point of my comment. Calm down. I’m not suggesting allegiance to anyone. The fact remains that AMD drivers are currently in the kernel.

        • @havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -29
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Those are the mesa drivers, not the “amd” drivers.

          Those very same drivers work on Intel cards and pre-20 series nvidia cards. Mesa is not an AMD project or an Intel project either, that is an independent team.

          Even then, those drivers are for allowing the GPU to display to a screen and interact with the system. They are pretty much the same idea as the Microsoft basic display adapter. You still need the xf86 drivers to display X, the opengl drivers for opengl, cuda for cuda, vulkan for vulkan, etc. Those are all separate components because they have libraries included with them.

          If all of those extras were built into the kernel, the kernel would be like 2 gigabytes, not 150ish megabytes. It is literally enough to get you going with a getty and that’s about it.

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            English
            301 year ago

            The drivers in the kernel (MESA) work with AMD out of the box. If you have AMD hardware, you don’t need anything else. What I said was “AMD drivers are currently in the kernel”. I did not specify that these drivers are developed by AMD – you seem to care a lot about that, but it’s not part of the argument I was making.

            Again, you seem to have misread my first comment, which on the Linux side means: you still need proprietary nvidia drivers on Linux. This is also true for Windows, where many folks are perfectly happy to continually update GeForce Now and stay in that ecosystem. That was the point of the comment.

            Not sure why you came at me with such hostility.

            • @havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -26
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not coming at you with hostility, I am informing you that what you are saying is incorrect. If you keep on skimming over everything I say, then perhaps I may get hostile because that is extremely annoying.

              If you are so sure of yourself on the kernel driver front, then do me a favor and fire up gentoo or arch and try to run a desktop environment or window manager without the mesa packages installed. You’ll find that xorg has mesa as a dependency, and there’s a very good reason for that: it’s because that’s not what the kernel driver is for, mesa itself is larger than the kernel itself. The kernel driver is exactly what I said it is, it allows the operating system to see and interact with the device, it doesn’t tell the device how to do its job, it tells it “here are some pipes, you will receive information from certain ones, and send it through others”. That’s exactly what a kernel driver does, there are no libraries or anything of that nature which is the overwhelming bulk of what makes a graphics driver.

              Also, geforce now is optional, you can as always install the drivers without the useless spyware application that nvidia provides.

              • circuitfarmer
                link
                English
                211 year ago

                If you keep on skimming over everything I say, then perhaps I may get hostile because that is extremely annoying.

                What is annoying is getting novel after novel of irrelevant information. Can you actually tell me what part of my first comment you are referring to?

                The closest I’ve seen is that you took “AMD drivers” meaning explicitly developed by AMD, but that’s not how adjectives work. Now you are all about needing more than MESA, which is also fine and correct, but irrelevant to my comment about nvidia drivers.

                • @havokdj@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -211 year ago

                  https://mesa3d.org/

                  Go read this and do not reply back until you understand what it is we are talking about.

                  RADV is not built into the kernel.

                  Stop trying to sidestep and make it seem like I’m misunderstanding, you know full damn well that when I say AMD drivers that I am referring to drivers for AMD hardware. You have the Foss drivers (mesa), the open source drivers, and the proprietary drivers. All of these are AMD drivers.

          • @__dev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 year ago

            Mesa isn’t a kernel driver. AMDGPU is the name of the kernel module and it’s primarily developed by AMD. Mesa provides OpenGL, Vulkan, etc. implementations and is funded by AMD, Intel and Valve (among others). There’s also AMDGPU-PRO which is a proprietary alternative to Mesa from AMD.

            • @havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -91 year ago

              You’re absolutely right, it isn’t one.

              That does not change my point in any way, mesa is not built into the kernel, which you need as a dependency to use X, which is required to run a window manager and/or WINE. I never ever said mesa was a kernel driver.