• Hot Saucerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nearly every religion preaches to be giving and kind to those in need. It’s absolutely not a non-sequitor to admit that a large number of atheists don’t believe there is any guiding morality to the universe and that we have to come to our own conclusions about morals and ethics. Moral relativism is a generally accepted thing among many atheists. This does not mean all atheists are selfish, I would classify most as Humanists. Rand was mostly an outlier.

    She was able to promote the idea that selfishness could be good because she didn’t ascribe to any religion that defined that as a sin.

    • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      She was able to promote the idea that selfishness could be good because she didn’t ascribe to any religion that defined that as a sin.

      So basically she profited from existing bullshit to promote her own brand of bullshit. That’s even worse.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is indeed worse, I agree.

        I do think it is odd she was embraced by Christians.

    • I’m not an atheist and even to me, that’s a really transparent dig at people who believe something you disagree with. You don’t need religion to be altruistic as you are implying.

        • Hot Saucerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I’m a fucking atheist and I think Ayn Rand was a loser sack of shit who leaned on every government assistance she preached against existing.

          So yeah, Rand was riding on it. I would like to think most fellow atheists reject her power-worship bullshit wrapped in “Objectivism.”