ruford1976@lemmy.worldBanned to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agoIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?message-squaremessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down16
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?ruford1976@lemmy.worldBanned to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squareseitanicdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·3 years agoBecause disallowing it would be worse. This has been a hot topic of debate for centuries. Check out the book On Liberty by John Stuart Mill.
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldBannedOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 years agoworked out (atleast practically) for nazism in germany though.
minus-squareseitanicdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·3 years agoNazism used force and violence.
minus-squareArthur_Leywin@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·3 years agoAnd Christianity never did?
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldBannedOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·3 years agoso lets say if this religion of hate uses and commands use of force and violence would you then consider banning it and it’s practice?
Because disallowing it would be worse. This has been a hot topic of debate for centuries. Check out the book On Liberty by John Stuart Mill.
worked out (atleast practically) for nazism in germany though.
Nazism used force and violence.
And Christianity never did?
so lets say if this religion of hate uses and commands use of force and violence would you then consider banning it and it’s practice?