cross-posted from !google@lemdro.id

  • Google may be altering billions of search queries daily to generate results that increase purchases.
  • Testimony in an antitrust case revealed an internal Google slide about changes to its search algorithm, involving “semantic matching” to generate more commercial results.
  • Google covertly changes user queries, substituting them with ones that generate more revenue for the company and display shopping-oriented results.
  • This manipulation benefits Google’s profits but harms search quality and raises advertiser costs.
  • Despite legal challenges, Google’s market dominance allows it to continue these practices, impacting users’ ability to access unbiased information.
  • @acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    impacting users’ ability to access unbiased information.

    I never like the implication that “unbiased” or “objective” info/searches exist. They don’t. Don’t get me wrong, google is 100% in the wrong here and is deliberately putting their thumb on the scale in a very certain way. But yeah, the “unbiased” thing always nags at me lol

    • ijeffOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I think it’s appropriate in terms of product review searches.

        • ijeffOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Reviews that don’t involve affiliate links or products provided by the company.

          • @acastcandream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How do you weight the different reviews that meet this criteria? Plenty of reviews don’t involve either.

            At some point you have to pick and choose. If it’s “truly” random, then the search is meaningless. If it’s curated/weighted, then it’s biased.

            • ijeffOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              The challenge is in elevating outright paid sponsorship and affiliate material above actual reviews.

    • @eumesmo@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      It would be nice if we could choose our bias. Sometimes, we might want it biased towards scientific sources, sometimes, towards user-generated content, sometimes towards institutional sites, etc.