ruford1976@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?message-squaremessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down16
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareIf there was a religion of hate, do you think it should be allowed to be practiced?ruford1976@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agobut allowing hate to be preached increases hate. so why would you allow it?
minus-squareseitaniclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoBecause disallowing it would be worse. This has been a hot topic of debate for centuries. Check out the book On Liberty by John Stuart Mill.
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoworked out (atleast practically) for nazism in germany though.
minus-squareseitaniclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoNazism used force and violence.
minus-squareArthur_Leywin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd Christianity never did?
minus-squareruford1976@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoso lets say if this religion of hate uses and commands use of force and violence would you then consider banning it and it’s practice?
but allowing hate to be preached increases hate.
so why would you allow it?
Because disallowing it would be worse. This has been a hot topic of debate for centuries. Check out the book On Liberty by John Stuart Mill.
worked out (atleast practically) for nazism in germany though.
Nazism used force and violence.
And Christianity never did?
so lets say if this religion of hate uses and commands use of force and violence would you then consider banning it and it’s practice?