No detectable amount of tritium has been found in fish samples taken from waters near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, where the discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea began a month ago, the government said Monday.

Tritium was not detected in the latest sample of two olive flounders caught Sunday, the Fisheries Agency said on its website. The agency has provided almost daily updates since the start of the water release, in a bid to dispel harmful rumors both domestically and internationally about its environmental impact.

The results of the first collected samples were published Aug. 9, before the discharge of treated water from the complex commenced on Aug. 24. The water had been used to cool melted nuclear fuel at the plant but has undergone a treatment process that removes most radionuclides except tritium.

    • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -331 year ago

      I don’t doubt nuclear power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let’s not take the planet with us.

      • @vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Y’kown we nuclear power plants cant explode like an atomic bomb right. Chernobyl was about the worst case scenario, and most of the blame is on dogshit soviet designs.

        Also if you bring up the Russian troops who got fucked up, that was caused by not using PPE and then promptly inhaling graphite dust and some randome mildly radioactive materials. It was fine while in the ground but breathing that shi in will do a number, probably still better than going to those old mining towns where the air is now made of asbestos.

        • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Chernobyl was about the worst case scenario, and most of the blame is on dogshit soviet designs.

          It’s happened three other times since then…

          Edit: one other time

      • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        This is the most ridiculous argument I’ve ever seen against nuclear energy. “Sure it works, but people are evil!”

        I can apply that to everything. Communism? I don’t doubt it works, but humans build and also destroy.

        • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This here is capitolist FUD, but I’m sure in all your great wisdom think humans can be trusted not to fuck up a 5th time.

          • osarusan
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            All you said that was humans mess up everything we do, as if that were something meaningful to say. That is not an argument against nuclear. That’s an argument against absolutely everything humans do. It’s meaningless. Look:

            I don’t doubt solar power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let’s not take the planet with us.

            I don’t doubt coal power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let’s not take the planet with us.

            I don’t doubt hydro power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let’s not take the planet with us.

            I don’t doubt steam power works. I just know how humans work. Everything we build we also destroy. Let’s not take the planet with us.

            All of those are exactly as meaningless as what you wrote. So don’t go on snarkily about my “great wisdom” like you’ve made any point at all. Nuclear is safer than oil and coal and gas, which is where the majority of the world’s energy comes from right now. Fossil fuels are actively destroying our planet right now, and you’re spreading nuclear FUD about things that haven’t happened. That’s not helpful, and it doesn’t match the reality we live in.

          • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            ???

            The USSR and Russia were huge players in nuclear technology and contributed a lot to the field. I actually can’t think of an energy source that has a closer connection to communism.

          • Roboticide
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            There’s nothing more capitalist than pushing coal and oil.

            And any rational green energy advocate knows it’ll take us decades to build enough solar/wind to fill the fossil fuels gap, but would only take us a couple years to fill that demand with nuclear and also produce fewer emissions. That’s simple numbers.

            So are you just irrational or a coal-snorting capitalist yourself?

            • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Show me this “fossil fuel gap” when it takes a decade for a nuclear power plant to run at full efficiency.

      • Hypx
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Nuclear is way safer than just about any other energy source.