• @underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    651 year ago

    Could they, instead, band together to offer a service that’s more user friendly than piracy? I suppose bribery is cheaper and easier.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      They did, it was called Netflix.

      Then the Netflix rates went up while everyone pulled and splintered content onto their own services and then started shuffling it around.

    • LimeWire
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      It would be such a wonderful thing wouldn’t it? Now where was I again about profits and squeezing the customers?

    • @Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Imagine not being able to force set the resolution and bitrate on your stream, even tho you pay for 4k. (Btw. Same goes for YT) Plex and jellyfin are just superior.

        • @Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What client do you use? I mostly use the iOS client and there they only give you the illusion of a choice: „higher quality“ and „lower quality“ maybe there are still clients which allow force set resolution/bitrate.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      What you’re asking for is a monopoly. It rarely is cheaper or easier. Sometimes, when heavily regulated, it could be. But history shows most of these are eventually privatized and deregulated and then we know what happens.

      • @underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Don’t put words in my mouth. Industries get together and set standards and form partnerships all the fucking time. It’s as much a “monopoly” as this lobbying project is.