@thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down126cross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.orgai_@lemmy.world
arrow-up125arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.com@thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.orgai_@lemmy.world
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink2•1 year agoIt’s convenient to be able to use whatever publicly available images you want for training, but it’s not necessary. Adobe proved this with their Firefly AI.
minus-square@sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoTheir text to image is nowhere near the abilities of other tools, and the rest are specialized tools. It’s convenient, yes, but without it these models are much more limited. Even of it was, my other points which you’ve ignored still stand
It’s convenient to be able to use whatever publicly available images you want for training, but it’s not necessary. Adobe proved this with their Firefly AI.
Their text to image is nowhere near the abilities of other tools, and the rest are specialized tools.
It’s convenient, yes, but without it these models are much more limited.
Even of it was, my other points which you’ve ignored still stand