• @qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    171
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Waaaaaaay better privacy, faster than chrome, don’t need to worry about them killing mandatory add ons so they can push ads, also the add ons just work better but maybe that’s confirmation bias.

    I’m sure there’s more I’m forgetting

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      It is not really faster than Chrome, but hey, at least I don’t have to manually opt out of monetizing my browsing history and my adblocker still works.

      • not really faster than Chrome

        Its also not really slower. If you are blocking plugins, it can be faster.

        Its fast enough I think is the broader point.

        • MudMan
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          It’s a weird pissing contest that still makes people angry for no reason, is what it is.

          It’s not the 90s, you’re not trying to parse a bunch of tables on a creaking chunk of barely cooked sand. You’re basically running standalone software through your browser anyway.

          Honestly, the one performance thing that bothers me on any modern browser is that some extension in my stack somewhere is memory leaking and makes me restart Firefox to restore performance every few hours. Can’t tell which one, but I need all of them, so hey, frequent reboots it is.

          • Blake [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            131 year ago

            Once it’s slower, hit F12 -> memory -> snapshot

            Should be pretty easy to check out which extension has shitloads of storage. Then you can decide how to go from there - maybe contact the author?

            • MudMan
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Memory leak may have been a misdiagnosis. The issue is clearly with Youtube, which is what most extensions I use are about, there is nothing obvious in the memory snapshot (not that it’d be easy to see, because video is a resource hog anyway) and the profiler seems to label the stutter with the very useful label of “jank”, so…

              Someone more familiar with web dev than I am may be able to take the profiler logs and debug this, but a) that’s not me, and b) not my job.

              • Blake [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Jank means that the renderer was delayed due to a resource conflict - usually because there’s something on the main thread that’s taking too long. Basically your issue is probably a CPU (or GPU) one, not a RAM one - It’s hard to help you out without knowing more about your environment, so all I can really give you is vague advice: if you’re using an adblocker other than uBlock Origin, switch to uBlock Origin, it has much better performance. Check the plugins and extensions and make sure there isn’t something you don’t recognise, if your computer was compromised at some point, cryptominer plugins can really tank performance.

                • MudMan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Figured that much. I’m not a web developer, but I can read a profiler, and the CPU usage spikes before those gaps are a pretty good sign that this isn’t a memory leak. I use uBlock Origin, by the way, but there’s likely some weird interaction between it, other Youtube extensions and Youtube’s own attempts to nuke adblockers from orbit. And no, it’s not a cryptominer as far as I can tell. This looks like either a bug or an unintended behavior of the very popular, very sanctioned plugins running on Firefox (or Firefox itself).

                  Which is why, as I said, I have settled for periodic reboots. Convenience wins over principle often, but I happen to be stubborn.

                  Gotta say, though, I appreciate the attempts at troubleshooting, but the OSS and privacy communities in general have a tendency to respond to comments on poor performance, compatibility or UX with tech support, and I think it’s kinda missing the point.

                  • Blake [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    31 year ago

                    The unfortunate thing is, most people aren’t having these kinds of performance issues. If a bug can’t be reproduced, it can’t be fixed. That makes these kinds of things pretty much impossible to fix until someone who is having the problem has the time/energy to dig into it, and the technical expertise to know what information and data to provide for a good bug report (which, honestly, is very rare), and then make themselves available for all of the inevitable follow-up questions and troubleshooting steps.

                    OSS devs are volunteers 99.9% of the time and they work on whatever they want to work on. A well written bug report with lots of context, a full memory snapshot, clear reproduction steps, expected/actual behaviour, full information on how to set up the environment from a fresh install, and so on, has a really good chance of being picked up by a developer. But if it’s even a little bit harder to just get to work on it, it’ll probably be ignored, because there are a hundred other more interesting issues to work on.

                    People can only help as much as they’re able to, we can’t fix your issue unless we know what it is, and usually the best place to start is by trying to make sure the surrounding environment is sane. If we went off assuming there was a Firefox bug and spent hours looking at a memory dump only to discover that your computer is a 2003 Intel Celeron or something, it would be a bit frustrating.

                    And yeah, most people just do not have the technical expertise to write a good bug report for a web browser - most devs are web developers or do business logic stuff - so it’s a tough nut to crack, and there’s not a huge number of people volunteering to help out open source software teams doing the soft skills stuff to coax useful information out of people who report issues :)

                    Hope that makes sense! OSS is very much a “be the change you want to see in the world” kind of place!

              • aDogCalledSpot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I’m actually having similar issues. Seemingly at random, my PC will freeze up due to lack of memory and killing Firefox fixes it. Im also sure it must be an extension causing it.

                Here are my extensions, let me know which of these you are using and maybe we can narrow it down from that:

                • Neat URL
                • uBlock Origin
                • Return YouTube Dislikes
                • Firefox Multi-Account Containers
                • SponsorBlock
                • Vimium
                • Decentraleyes
                • Enhancer for YouTube
                • Privacy Possum
                • I don’t care about cookies
                • First Party Isolation
                • Startpage Privacy Protection
                • MudMan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  FWIW, the only ones we share on that list are uBlock, Dislikes and Enhancer.

                  Again, best guess is Youtube is desperately trying to poop out some ads and getting reinvented within an inch of its life by those extensions (not to mention dragged kicking and screaming into having pop-up playback windows) and something breaks in there somewhere. I’m not holding my breath for a fix anytime soon.

          • @Little1Lost@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            i looked at the graph and it seems like the speed of firefox is way more stable. At the moment i think the normal speeds are equal. Chrome has sometimes very big spikes in booth directions (the grey dots on the right sides that seem to be out of order) so the fastes from the records is still chrome, on this one specific date

      • unalivejoy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -121 year ago

        It is not really faster than Chrome

        It is if I close my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.

    • @Tibert@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Sadly not everywhere. On mobile it lacks behind. Even more on video content and low power cpus.

      Chromium is slightly better in a way where I could clic on the video buttons without lag : On my android TV, (sideloaded) Firefox had issues with video buttons. So I tried using kiwi browser (for the extension support), and it worked well for buttons. The video wasn’t a lot smoother, but it just seemed maybe just slightly better.

      • Blake [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        When you say video, do you mean YouTube and on other Google sites? Not sure if you knew this, but Google has proprietary shit on their websites that enables special features just for Chrome. Even if Firefox wanted to implement those features, Google wouldn’t let Firefox use them.

        • @Resistentialism@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Used Firefox android for at least a long arse time now. I can’t remember any issues. Other than one site, but that works perfectly in duckduckgo browser.

    • pacjo
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Sorry to hijack, but can anyone help me with my issue?

      I’m using librewolf and since about a week or two I noticed a speed issue. Overall my internet is fast, way faster then I need in fact, but websites load at a unreasonably slow speed.

      When opening anything librewolf just sits there loading for a few second (probably up to ~10) then page opens fine. Video playback works great too. What could be the issue?

      • ddh
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        Could be DNS?

        • Bizarroland
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          It’s almost never DNS, except when it is.

          Try setting your DNS to adguards default servers and see if that helps.

          Those addresses are 94.140.14.14 and 94.140.15.15.

          If you don’t want to do that you could always set it to 1.1.1.1 but adguards DNS servers also help filter ads so that’s nice.

        • pacjo
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I don’t know. If I use chrome on the same device there are no issues. You can’t be certain but I think it’s not DNS.

          • ddh
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            That might be evidence in favour of it being a DNS issue. Google Chrome doesn’t always use the system’s DNS.

            • pacjo
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Good to know, but for now it seems like the issue solved itself. Will report later if anything changes.

      • gullible
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Do you use many addons? Resetting everything to stock and reinstalling addons one by one is my go-to as occasionally your profile is the issue. Just backup your profile beforehand and there’s 0 loss, aside from like 20 minutes.