• Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      Of course it’s okay we sanction human rights abusers. Europe does it, too. Am I supposed to disagree with another country’s sanctions or something?

      • @emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Human rights abusers when they aren’t our allies. US has been pretty chill with Saudi Arabia and they literally dismembered someone on foreign soil because they vocally opposed the tyrannical regime.

        • @Opafi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Saying there should be harsher treatment of SA doesn’t make the sanctions against China any less justified.

        • Franzia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Saudi Arabia is allies only with our Republican governments. They have been and are going to keep effectively sanctioning us by raising the price of oil before our next election.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      This but unironically.

      The court filings also show allegations that “profits from oil sales support the IRGC’s full range of malign activities, including the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery, support for terrorism and both domestic and international human rights abuses.”

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Yes. Also that has no relevance here.

          Are you suggesting the Iranian government is not a hell state that deserves sanctions?

          • @hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Plenty of hell states deserve sanctions, including the US. Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions. You’re just parroting US propaganda which pretends human rights are why it applies sanctions when in reality that is the last thing on their mind.

            • @SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              So you agree they deserve sanctions and this is a good thing.

              Why are you arguing?

              • @hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

                • @SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  No, but whether or not I agree the US should be sanctioned is not relevant here.

            • @SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I’m unaware of a pending invasion of Iran, and I think it’s about a year late for the kind of intervention I’d have liked to see.

              The Iranian government has no right to exist, and should absolutely be overthrown, though.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      “In addition, pursuant to a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) and a seizure warrant issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Empire Navigation, the operating company of the vessel carrying the contraband cargo, agreed to cooperate and transport the Iranian oil to the United States – an operation which has now concluded.”

      • DOJ Press Release

      Is playing fast and loose with the facts also okay when you do it?