• 133arc585
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This type of logic only makes sense in the case of public utilities, not privately owned companies.

    What do they think we’re paying for? I don’t see how the non-amortized costs (ie, non-infrastructure-buildout costs) could ever approach the amount they pull in revenue. This also ignores the fact that the telcos have gotten somewhere in the double-digit billions of dollars (iirc, around $40B) in taxpayer money to build out fiber infrastructure, that they never delivered on. What are they using this money for? What are they using their subscription revenue for?

    • _haha_oh_wow_
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are mistaken: It’s not over 40 billion, it’s closer to half a trillion.

      • 133arc585
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Thanks for the correction, I almost wish I didn’t know how bad it was!