• @n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    3410 months ago

    They’re not just lowering the speed limit. From the FAQ:

    Will the roll out involve money being spent on speed bumps?

    There is no plan to include traffic calming (including speed bumps) as part of the change to speed limits. There are other ‘softer’ measures that might be introduced, such as using buffer speed limits, removing the centre line, narrowing the carriageway visually, using planting etc.

    These ‘softer’ measures (which definitely are traffic calming) will be essential to make this plan a success. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada is going through a similar process of lowering speed limits in residential areas. The planning staff said they needed the speed lowered so they could implement these traffic calming measures, otherwise the speed limit would be higher than the street design can accommodate.

    • oo1
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      yeah there are places where you can add a hard separated a bike lane and rejig parking - not so much for the bikes, but to narrow the carriage way and reduce the ‘natural’ speed of the road.

    • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      i can understand not strictly calling paint traffic calming, but planters? what galaxy brain definition of traffic calming are they using where placing a box on the road isn’t traffic calming?

      • @n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        My guess is the phrase “traffic calming” has negative connotations with the local general public due to poor implementation.

        I’ve driven down streets that are 50km/h and I think most people would gladly do ≤60km/h. If that’s too fast, there’s many ways to ‘softly’ calm the speed like narrowing the road, chicanes, paving stones, etc. Instead, they have speed bumps ever couple kms so drivers slow to a crawl for the bump, then accelerate hard to >70km/h, then brake hard to go over the next bump.