• @positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was thinking of letting the victim’s close ones do what they want to the demons for one day, but I’m not sure what that would do with their psyche afterwards.
      E: The psyche of those doing the retribution.

    • LoafyLemon
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Maybe not, but it is a humane thing to do, and it removes the problem.

      • @bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -101 year ago

        Yeah. Torture is fine, so is a simple bullet to the back of the head.

        Whichever is a bigger deterrent for these crimes should be enacted.

        • @Custodian1623@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 year ago

          people don’t commit these crimes with the expectation that they’re going to be caught. I don’t know how serious you are but I find it a little disturbing to condone torture

          • @bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -71 year ago

            What do you think would be a more effective deterrent?

            Sorry reality disturbs you. Let me know when you think of something better. It looks like these people weren’t deterred by the possible consequences of their actions.

        • LoafyLemon
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Knowing that one’s existence will cease if they commit such crimes should serve as a sufficient deterrent.

          • @elscallr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            It doesn’t, though. There’s no evidence that the death penalty serves any sort of deterrent. It isn’t a punitive measure, it’s vengeance. If you’re ok with vengeance I respect your opinion though I disagree, but we can’t pretend it’s anything but vengeance.

            • LoafyLemon
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I believe the use of the death penalty in severe cases isn’t driven by vengeance; it’s more about preventing the individual from causing harm to others in the future. It’s important to recognize that not all criminals can be successfully rehabilitated, such as psychopaths or serial killers.

              However, if the death penalty were to exist, I believe it should be carried out by the person who pronounces the verdict personally. This would ensure that such a grave decision is not made lightly.

              • @elscallr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                Could you not prevent them from causing additional harm by not killing them? What if you’re wrong? There’s plenty of reason to leave them alive, but only one real reason to kill them, and that reason is vengeance.

                • LoafyLemon
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Are you familiar with how the psychopathic mind functions? They lack empathy, and I don’t mean it in a pejorative sense, no, I mean it literally.

                  Psychopaths are hard to reason with due to their lack of aforementioned empathy, manipulative nature, impulsivity, shallow emotions, and absence of remorse.

                  If they killed once, they will kill again.

            • LoafyLemon
              link
              fedilink
              7
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              As a society, we should strive to be better than the people we judge for their crimes. Torturing people is just wrong, cruel, and unnecessary.

              • @bobman@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -131 year ago

                I’m sorry you feel that way. Maybe when you get more life experience, you’ll realize that most scumbags will only avoid engaging in heinous acts if the deterrent for doing so is appropriate.

                • @RoquetteQueen@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Let’s say we do decide to torture murderers. Who is going to torture them? Are we going to pay for these people to have therapy (because they’re really going to need it)? How would you feel if you found out your next-door neighbour tortures people for a living? What do we do when we find out, years later, that we’ve been torturing an innocent person?

                  I think you need a little more life experience so you can realize that things aren’t as simple as you seem to think they are.

                  • @bobman@unilem.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -31 year ago

                    Gee, how did we ever do it in the past? It’s never been done before, lol.

                    I think you need a little more life experience so you can realize that things aren’t as simple as you seem to think they are.

                    Study history, then come back.