Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

  • stopthatgirl7OP
    link
    fedilink
    1910 months ago

    …Yeah, do you realize how bad taste it is to compare not letting cops in to Jim Crow discrimination against Black folks? Y’know, the people cops kill a lot?

    I see what you’re trying to do, but…can you please not.

          • stopthatgirl7OP
            link
            fedilink
            1310 months ago

            Yeah, I know, which is why I said I get where you were coming from, but it was still in poor taste.

              • @mob@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You are getting a funny reaction but I get you.

                Dude said legalize “no questions asked discrimination” and you referenced a very well known example of discrimination in recent history. Seemed like a logical response to me.

                • stopthatgirl7OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  910 months ago

                  Yeah, but the issue is using that particular example in a post talking about police.

                  Also, as a Black American, it’s really tiring when we and discrimination against us get pulled out to use as examples. Like, just keep us out of it some times.

                  • @mob@lemmy.world
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Thats goofy.

                    You’re telling me that if the conversation starts with cops, you agree with someone saying “they should be able to turn anyone away, no questions asked.”?

                    Dude didn’t say discriminating against cops is the same as discriminating against black people.

                  • Cethin
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I don’t know what you’re not getting. Your post was about police specifically. The top comment of this chain days for any reason whatsoever, which could include, but is not limited to, race. The post isn’t wrong, the top level comment here is because some people would use the liberty of blocking anyone they want to ban people of color, which has happened in the past hence the example.

      • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Everyone is misunderstanding your post. Add the words “your suggested policy could lead back to” before the sign you were referencing. I only finally got that context by reading the entire thread just now