That’s simply not how I read it at all. He’s referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.
It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn’t review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.
Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.
Love that the respose ignores every point just deflects again to a completely different topic
Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are “amateurs”.
Except that is exactly how it reads.
ignore everyone else looking at the code because they’re amateurs as we’re the only professionals here
That’s simply not how I read it at all. He’s referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.
It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn’t review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.
Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.
I simply do not share this interpretation of his comments at all.
I know, but you also can’t see anything but positives from anything they do
And I can say the reverse to you. You interpret every decision made in the worst possible light.
Because I’m a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.