Finally getting some (closer to) mainstream video cards from AMD. Still feels overpriced but a lot better than $750 for a 7900xt.

  • @entropicdrift
    link
    191 year ago

    Why would you use the official ones? Mesa is better

    • @dark_stang@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Yeah I don’t think I’ve had a single crash with the mesa drivers after my overclock was dialed in. And I’ve ran some pretty janky stuff (like my vega 56 that was flashed with a 64 bios).

    • @XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Are you talking from personal experience? If so, I might give them a try.

      I tought AMD official drivers where the best option for graphics and performance.

      • @entropicdrift
        link
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, personal experience, but also from benchmarks, the open source mesa drivers are just faster at this point, unless you’re turning on raytracing in everything.

        • @XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Nah, I may play around with raytracing in the future, but it’s not a must for me.

          Well, I will give the open source drivers a try, thanks.

    • @CreativeTensors@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      How is ROCm these days? I remember needing the official AMD drivers for OpenCL stuff a while ago and ROCm was in very early development.

      • @entropicdrift
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For ROCm you need the official drivers. For OpenCL, RustiCL (OpenCL implemented over Vulkan) works perfectly for me.