@sixfold to Programming@programming.devEnglish • edit-210 months agoThe Human Shaderhumanshader.comexternal-linkmessage-square10arrow-up1119arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgprogramming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foohackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1116arrow-down1external-linkThe Human Shaderhumanshader.com@sixfold to Programming@programming.devEnglish • edit-210 months agomessage-square10file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgprogramming@programming.devhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foohackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareSibbolinkfedilink12•10 months agoSo many people got it right that the ones who got it wrong really stand out
minus-square@yumpoopsoup@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink2•10 months agoMost the errors were made earlier interestingly
minus-square@brian@programming.devlinkfedilink2•10 months agoprobably since later people could look at the partial image, see that pink wasn’t a very likely color, and check their math until the result looked more correct
minus-square@yumpoopsoup@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink1•10 months agoI thought so but I also think they should’ve not been able to see the other pixels until it was done, since pixels are rendered in isolation(usually?)
So many people got it right that the ones who got it wrong really stand out
Most the errors were made earlier interestingly
probably since later people could look at the partial image, see that pink wasn’t a very likely color, and check their math until the result looked more correct
I thought so but I also think they should’ve not been able to see the other pixels until it was done, since pixels are rendered in isolation(usually?)