Which is not a good look for privacy.com. You have to be either very lazy to not set up the redirect, or use a very cheap service that doesn’t allow you to do it.
No, it’s just ensuring SSL encryption to their servers at all times. It’s the best possible look for a website called privacy.com.
If they allowed http connections, those connections aren’t guaranteed to be private (encrypted).
If you’re getting “site not found”: https://privacy.com/
http://privacy.com/ doesn’t work, it doesn’t answer on port 80.
Fascinating. I use Firefox with “Force HTTPS” enabled so I never noticed this before.
Does that mean you can’t explore sites like toastytech.com?
I just get a “Secure site not available” warning with a button to proceed into the HTTP site anyway
I defer to second image on this post when I see that
Which is not a good look for privacy.com. You have to be either very lazy to not set up the redirect, or use a very cheap service that doesn’t allow you to do it.
No, it’s just ensuring SSL encryption to their servers at all times. It’s the best possible look for a website called privacy.com. If they allowed http connections, those connections aren’t guaranteed to be private (encrypted).
I’m talking about leaving http://privacy.com (the non-secured version) not leading anywhere. It’s an amateur move.
Right. I don’t feel like trusting my CC information to a company that doesn’t even know how to do a redirect.