• Korthrun
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Consider a usage other than “fear”. Think of something hydrophobic. Do you really think that an inanimate surface is afraid of water?

    I don’t think it’s technically incorrect, I think folks have been taught an overly narrow usage of the suffix.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Aversion” is the most accurate meaning I can think of. It could be aversion out of hate, fear, or something else.

      • Korthrun
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nooooo don’t invoke the wrath of the hydrohomies!

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.cabanned_from_community_badge
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fair point. I personally like that it’s insulting though so I like the wide definition more.

      • Korthrun
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have no desire to argue that :D Fuck those fucking fucks until they’re totally fucked.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The fact that someone decided to describe an inanimate object as scared of water doesn’t invalidate words with ‘phobic’