toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoUh...feddit.nlimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1315arrow-down117
arrow-up1298arrow-down1imageUh...feddit.nltoothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squarejanAkalilinkfedilinkarrow-up158·edit-26 months agoVibecoding: go to chatgpt ask it to make an app ask it to fix errors (ad infinitum) ??? sell app (optional) get sued and ruin your reputation (hopefully)
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·6 months agoLargely accurate apart from special-purpose tools usually being employed instead of ChatGPT
minus-squarejanAkalilinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-26 months agoSame thing. Coding agents just automate the third step and waste even more money and energy.
minus-squareTORFdot0@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·6 months agoThe ??? isn’t a reference to underpants gnomes. It’s just that no one has ever gotten LLMs to actually fix its own bugs to find out what that step is
minus-squaredangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoI think it has to use one of the specialized AI coding agents like Claud Code. This way, it can burn more tokens and ruin your code base at scale.
Vibecoding:
Largely accurate apart from special-purpose tools usually being employed instead of ChatGPT
Same thing. Coding agents just automate the third step and waste even more money and energy.
The ??? isn’t a reference to underpants gnomes. It’s just that no one has ever gotten LLMs to actually fix its own bugs to find out what that step is
I think it has to use one of the specialized AI coding agents like Claud Code. This way, it can burn more tokens and ruin your code base at scale.