toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 个月前Uh...feddit.nlimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1315arrow-down117
arrow-up1298arrow-down1imageUh...feddit.nltoothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 个月前message-square49linkfedilink
minus-squarejanAkalilinkfedilinkarrow-up158·edit-24 个月前Vibecoding: go to chatgpt ask it to make an app ask it to fix errors (ad infinitum) ??? sell app (optional) get sued and ruin your reputation (hopefully)
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·4 个月前Largely accurate apart from special-purpose tools usually being employed instead of ChatGPT
minus-squarejanAkalilinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-24 个月前Same thing. Coding agents just automate the third step and waste even more money and energy.
minus-squareTORFdot0@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·4 个月前The ??? isn’t a reference to underpants gnomes. It’s just that no one has ever gotten LLMs to actually fix its own bugs to find out what that step is
minus-squaredangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 个月前I think it has to use one of the specialized AI coding agents like Claud Code. This way, it can burn more tokens and ruin your code base at scale.
Vibecoding:
Largely accurate apart from special-purpose tools usually being employed instead of ChatGPT
Same thing. Coding agents just automate the third step and waste even more money and energy.
The ??? isn’t a reference to underpants gnomes. It’s just that no one has ever gotten LLMs to actually fix its own bugs to find out what that step is
I think it has to use one of the specialized AI coding agents like Claud Code. This way, it can burn more tokens and ruin your code base at scale.