• FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    Nope, not surprising, which is why I figure it’s as-designed.

    That’s not really something that’s needed.

    Well, is it? If the problem is that no new editors are joining then perhaps something that new editors would enjoy working on is needed.

    If Wikipedia is fine with continuing to get greyer and greyer, ossifying into a “proper” and “serious” encyclopedia, then that’s fine I guess. If new blood is needed, on the other hand, maybe look at things that would attract it and consider that as something that’s needed.

    It’s not like Wikipedia can offer a wage increase.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Wikipedia is already a proper encyclopedia, as has been the case six years ago. Pop culture sections are still allowed, they’re just restricted to reliably sourced entries to prevent being disproportionally long and having shaky entries that are a stretch

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Yes, those are all things I said in my comment already. I think they are the main reason for the lack of new blood.

        If you don’t think the lack of new blood is a problem, then that’s all fine. If the lack of new blood is a problem, then maybe those things need to be reevaluated.