• @schroedingershat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    These are the walkable non-suburban communities being talked about. Why are you trying to use examples of the desired outcome as a counter example (and reason to continue destroying said towns)?

    • @FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am responding to the suggestion that only high-density communities are sustainable. That’s simply not true. It is possible for people to live sustainably in either low density or high density communities.

      Which in turn implies that the problem with suburbs is not necessarily their density, but other factors.

      • If you can walk or use a low speed vehicle to get to your destination and you can walk to the second family down in 5 minutes it’s not a low density settlement just because you can see a single story house.

        Villages are missing middle (at least until the commercial center gets gutted and replaced with car yards and parking and 50% of the houses are demolished for highway).