• notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe they will band together to support a common base system that is more open? Wishful thinking I know…

      • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I mean, if I was Unihertz, I’d give all my drivers’ code to LineageOS and sales would skyrocket. I don’t know why they don’t do this.

        • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Even just providing specifications and some documentation about the devices, someone might write a new driver. Reverse engineering is hard, having something to go off of means they can probably extend support from an existing driver fairly easily.

          • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            The biggest issue is probably the MediaTek chipsets. Unlike Qualcomm, they don’t provide the source code.

            I only went with MTK based device for manual band selection. It can be done with root, but the only app for it I could find is network signal guru, and I am not sure about how trustworthy it is to give root access to.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Without more detail we can’t really speculate. Who decides what sort of update is required?

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I guess security only and once a year, if anything. It’s going to be hard to enforce.

      Even big OEM usually do slow updates after 2 years.