• @Vegoon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Your math is flawed:

    A plant based diet reduces the impact by -3/4, your solution by -1

    If i convince 4 others to do the same, or 8 to reduce it by half my impact is -3 not counting cascading effects.

    That is if you would follow trough with your suggestion which I have doubts. So not only is your solution not better, it is worse and you don’t act the way you propose.

    • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What if I, like above, convince 4 others to do the same?

      (oh do we do that whole /s thing here?)

      • @Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        How big is your suicide cult right now? I have been vegan for over 5 years and made a impact on many others while you talk smart on the internet. You just justify not taking responsibility with a stupid hyperbolic example you don’t follow trough. I can advocate going vegan because I follow trough. You, you are just pathetic.

        • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          ahhh, I get it now. Here I can perhaps help this misunderstanding a little; not everything has to be a cult or cult like. Sometimes I like to make a little joke on the math provided but that does not mean I am inactive or not taking responsibility.

    • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      this is only true if you believe the myth that you’re responsible for your"carbon footprint" instead of the people who are actually making the emissions.

      • @Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Just because one is paying someone to create emissions does not make them responsible because someone else did it?

          • @Vegoon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            ah, they use their private money to burn oil in their backyard. alright.

            the animal industry would just keep breeding and abusing animals despite no one buying their stuff. OK.

            • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              you don’t seem to understand how linear time works. polluters pollute before anyone buys their product. whether anyone buys the product or not, the pollution has already happened.

              • @Vegoon@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Ah, the “the damage is already done” argument. Has anyone told you that you pay for the next victim of the industry? Buying the product supports the industry and keeps it alive.

                Maybe you have no concept of future.