• King
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1301 year ago

    Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

      • King
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -621 year ago

        The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

        • @qfjp@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          281 year ago

          It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

          • King
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -191 year ago

            They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

            • @qfjp@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

              • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
              • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…”
              • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?”

              also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

              I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

              Flash used to be a mobile extension…

              • King
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -141 year ago

                What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

                • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  The article is about how i currently Firefox only supports 10 extensions, specifically developed for mobile, but in the future it will allow all the extensions that are available for desktop. And how no other mobile browser so far accepts all desktop extensions, making Firefox the first.

                  It’s really not that hard to understand

        • Beaupedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          I think you’re a little confused about what’s being said here.

          • King
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -271 year ago

            I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

      • ⁧⁧⁧
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You do realize other mobile browsers also come with an ad blocker…right? Look up Vivaldi for example.

      • King
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Idk what u mean but whatever ad scenario u have going on in your brain, i said extensions supported, which means adblocks included