• circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    10 months ago

    Synology requires self-branded drives

    I’ve started to categorize enshittification headlines by how many words it takes me to know I won’t be dealing with a company again (after reviewing the article for accuracy, of course). This one only took 5 words, and one is a compound. That’s pretty efficient.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zoneBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re going to have to change that system, because this is just people flying off half cocked and not getting the full details.

      Headline: “Synology requires self-branded drives”

      Reality: “Synology removes health check feature for non-synology-branded drives, but they still work fine”

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Still enough to make me seek solutions elsewhere. Ultimately, the hedged version is headed in the same direction.

        Not enough people considering / remembering why FOSS exists in the first place as all these companies enshittify.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zoneBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s up to you to decide I guess, but it means that you can buy an upcoming plus series synology nas and put all fresh new Iron Wolf/WD Red/etc drives in it without issue.

          I don’t really think it’s a sign that they’re going to completely lock them down any time soon as they know that would completely destroy their non-corporate side of the business.

          I’ve contemplated making my own NAS, but the synology hardware and software is just unbeatable for the price and effort imo.

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t really think it’s a sign that they’re going to completely lock them down any time soon as they know that would completely destroy their non-corporate side of the business.

            Ultimately then we disagree on how far clueless execs will go to chase that endless growth. But we can agree to disagree.