• GenderNeutralBro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If we’re talking about Matrix as a Discord alternative, then that would mean thousands of channels, each with hundreds or thousands of users, many with constant activity.

    I’m not sure if anybody actually uses Matrix at the scale of the average Discord user. Sliding sync is supposed to help, but I don’t think the Matrix architecture can realistically scale that high.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You might have a very different definition of “average Discord user” than the average Discord user.

      • GenderNeutralBro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Or perhaps you do not understand how Discord is commonly used.

        People join dozens of servers. Maybe one for every game they play, every TV show they watch, every podcast they listen to. Everything has a Discord.

        Even small Discord servers have many channels. Bigger ones will have dozens or hundreds of channels.

        Some servers have millions of users. Most of the servers I’m in have thousands.

        Many channels are default for all users in the server.

        Not sure what the mathematical average is, but this is certainly common at least, and any alternative that can’t handle this is no alternative at all.