• Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would also require everyone to own 4+ houses which isn’t exactly feasible

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It would require a lot of housing density for everyone to own four dwellings (and would kill rent demand well and good), but I wouldn’t call it infeasible. For everyone to have a quarter acre lawn and a 2,000 square foot house that shares no walls with neighbors? With those additional requirements having everyone own four is infeasible, sure, but a belief that’s the only dwelling worth owning is how we have throttled our housing supply in the first place.

    • phindex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The product/service is the use of the property for the specified time.

      How is this any different from renting a SeeDo for an hour?

      And if everyone did this when they were able to, rents across the board would be dirt cheap.