• Square Singer
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    You can’t use You can’t use Slack for Video Calls? Or Teams? Or Signal? Or Threema? Or WhatsApp? Or Facebook Messenger? Or almost any other 1:1 chat app/protocol that survived long enough?

    All of my examples were originally text-only messengers meant for sending text messages, pretty similar to email.

    And even email didn’t stay completely “pure”, as, over time, it evolved file attachments.

    • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Those are all apps that implement multiple different protocols to do chat/audio/video. Also none of those are federated to my knowledge, you can’t chat as a teams user with someone on whatsapp. Lemmy and kbin can talk to each other, just like outlook and Gmail and Hotmail can.

      • Square Singer
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, now please check the title and content of the OP.

        The whole discussion is about the downsides of federated protocols/apps/systems vs non-fedreated ones.

        And my point was that it’s much easier to expand non-federated software.

        • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I’m not sure you can make that argument. It’s more about having a dedicated developer base than federation. FOSS has almost always been behind corporate development, that’s not really a downside of federation itself.

          • Square Singer
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            The whole system behind eMail (all the protocols involved and all the software implementing it) has been built by FOSS and non-FOSS, commercial and non-commercial entities.

            Over the decades there were enormous amounts of money and enthusiast labour on it.

            And still it’s really hard to make sure that the address in the “From:” field is actually the one that sent the email. And if you try to do something trivial like sending an encrypted message to a random email user, chances are almost zero that that user is actually able to read the encrypted email, because it requires additional configuration.

            There were >40 years of time, millions of man hours and billions of dollars have been invested in the eMail system, and yet trivial things that pretty much every major messaging service has are still outlandish for eMail.

            And not even Gmail, with all their money, managed to fix these issues.